429-481 George Street Sydney NSW 2000

I find the suggestion that these "global brands" are having their potential advertising and business impacted by an over 100 year old building facade to be laughable. The QVB is one of the most important heritage buildings and shopping locales in our CBD and, quite frankly, any other business would jump to be in the place of these international businesses who work tirelessly to ensure they pay 0 corporate tax to Australia. It is time for this country to stand up and say "No" to these companies, and remind them that if they want the share of our market that they have to contribute to us, not the other way around. Likewise for their requests for reduced rent - truly sod off. Changing the character of this historic building to appease some venture capital firm buying up legacy brands and applying terrible marketing practices to their brick and mortar stores is absolutely not in the spirit of this city or what we stand for in the preservation of our heritage.

I work in the CBD and catch the train to Town Hall 5 days a week. QVB is a beautiful landmark right in the heart of the city, that clearly brings joy to many who pass through it. The amount of tourists that are always at the south entrance taking photos is clear testament to its popularity and beauty. Retailers are lucky to have such consistent footfall from the large amount of people who enjoy the space.

I think the building is currently in great shape, it's been restored quite well, and feels grand and luxurious. Please don't touch it.

This is outrageous. That coloured glass is part of the historic building. Running along the top hardly 'interrupts the view' at all. People barely notice that it's there, and that makes this a rather specious argument.

The QVB is an iconic landmark of Sydney. People come to see it and appreciate its beauty from across the Sydney region, across the state, the country and even across the world. It's foolish to lessen the historical accuracy and impact of the building. It would eventually just have to be restored to the original state, making this change at best a temporary and wasteful endeavour.

Why waste public tax dollars on taking away part of a beautiful building that's part of our history? It would be a double waste as it just means that in future, tax money would be used *again* to restore the coloured glass and return the building to its original historic design.

Save our taxes twice over. Please don't take away this small, subtle beauty.

Please don’t compromise a heritage building - one of the most iconic in Sydney! - to pander to shortsighted retailers. It’s your role to preserve our heritage, not to prop up extremely wealthy retailers who want to turn the QVB into another bland shop window.

Please deny this proposal, the glass panes are a beautiful artistic and historic piece of the QVB, do not allow this to happen. This building is my favourite thing to see every time I go to Sydney, you do not change a masterpiece such as this for commercial reasons.

This building's character is a defining piece of our city's identity. It is a landmark, a meeting place, a backdrop to so many of our memories, individual and collective. Please preserve its character by retaining its fabric.

The appearance of this historic and beautiful building should not be changed. It will significantly alter the look of this building to replace the glass.
Further the coloured glass is not at eye level and does not actually block any views of merchandise inside the building.

People don't come to Sydney to see high end brands. High end brands are everywhere. People come to Sydney to see icons like the QVB.

By being disloyal to the heritage of the building you run the risk of robbing the building of its unique appeal.

The qvb isn't going to be able to compete on window size with modern alternatives and nor should it. It's a heritage building and there in lies its appeal.

You should focus on fixing the basement amenities level up a touch if you're looking to fancy up the place.

This is a historic building that attracts worldwide tourism. It's insane that this is even being considered. Those spaces will be taken by other shops regardless. We don't need to cater to every "global brand" whose imperative it is to funnel money out of Australia anyway.

This proposal is an affront to the intrinsic value of this heritage icon.

Commercialism is an affront to historical significance and should never be a reason to deface public heritage...i would never go there again if this vandalism occurs

The destruction of our beautiful buildings by companies describing them as 'blocking goods from being displayed' is clearly just a cynical attempt at litigation in an attempt to save money. They know it will most likely not be approved. I hope we can stand firm in the face of companies who demand a right to the beauty of our city, hoping no doubt to one day have our streets be little more than conveyor belts taking us from point of sale to point of sale.

I believe the QVB is one of Sydney (and Australia’s) most important land marks - and I am disappointed that this change would even be considered. Conserving what beautiful buildings we have left is paramount for our continued enjoyment of the city and is our responsibility to maintain for future generations.

The QVB is foremost a heritage site, not a shopping centre and should be treated as such.

To see that this proposal is being considered is truly saddening. The coloured glass is not just an aesthetic feature, but an integral part of the QVB’s historical and architectural identity. As a heritage-listed building, it is crucial that we preserve the unique elements that define its character. I hope that logic prevails.

The coloured glass contributes to the architectural and historical character of the building. The QVB is a tourist draw and to replace the coloured glass with transparent glass would ruin the visual appeal but also do little to encourage spending and visits at upscale retailers who are likely down on their business due to the cost of living crisis, rather than the inability of passersby to squint into the narrow visibility of the shopping mezzanine.

There's no way this is seriously being considered right? The QVB has an invaluable cultural significance to the city of Sydney and the stained glass facade is what makes it gorgeous

Good afternoon,
Those glass panels give character and life to the building. How are they not part of a heritage facade?? They're beautiful and irreplaceable. I would rather not shop at places that can't appreciate the beauty and history of the building they reside in.

Next they'll want to replace the flooring and clocks because it "doesn't match their products"....

This proposal is nothing short of small minded and selfish in the pursuit of commercial gain. The QVB has already been threatened once in the past, and its preservation has come as a blessing to the city and all who have been lucky enough to see the building in person. Do not let this ridiculous plan become the beginning of the erosion of such a beautiful and important part of our Sydney heritage.

It’s genuinely upsetting that this may even be considered. The QVB is a heritage-listed public landmark, not a space to be altered for short-term retail preferences. What a hide these companies have!

The coloured glass is part of what gives the building its character and atmosphere. Removing it strips away something that can never be replaced. This kind of change chips away at what makes the QVB special and should not be allowed.

You soulless ghouls CANNOT be serious. It is appalling that you would even consider defiling a unique piece of Sydney’s heritage with sole purpose of increasing profits by 0.6% this quarter. This is so comically evil and ridiculous. I genuinely hope you lay awake at night grappling with existential pain, but I’m assuming you don’t, because you’re all sociopaths.

City of Sydney I implore you, please do not approve the replacement of this beautiful coloured glass on such an historic and special landmark of our city. There will be nothing gained from this; it will be a pointless exercise in bowing down to capitalist forces.

Please don’t approve this approval. It is very shortsighted and disappointing that this is being pushed by global companies in a bid to make more money at the expense of the historic and unique nature of the QVB.

I strongly object to the proposal to remove and replace the coloured glass windows at the Queen Victoria Building.

The justification provided by Vicinity Group, that the coloured glass creates a “significant economic burden” and makes the tenancy “undesirable”, is unsubstantiated. The QVB is one of Sydney’s most iconic heritage buildings, and its distinctive glazing is a fundamental element of its architectural and cultural significance.

Ongoing declines in CBD retail rents are well documented and reflect post-COVID conditions and long-term structural shifts toward online shopping. Comparing current leasing outcomes with historic leases signed decades ago is neither valid nor meaningful.

If a tenancy cannot be secured at the current asking rent, the appropriate response is to adjust the rent and asset valuation, not to permanently alter a defining heritage feature of a State-significant building for commercial convenience.

Given the City of Sydney is a co-owner of the QVB, there is a heightened responsibility to protect its heritage values. Financial considerations should not be allowed to override established conservation principles.

I urge Council to reject this proposal.

Heritage listed stained glass should only be replaced with similarly coloured glass and should only be done if it is damaged and requires replacement. It should never be replaced with clear glass.

The coloured glass is a part of QVB's intrinsic character and removing it would compromise the beauty and public enjoyment of the building. The building should not have to adapt to the whims of unsuitable tenants, to the detriment of the public.

Just No! That would be outrageous vandalism. This lovely heritage building needs protection, not desecration to please business owners.
I trust the Heritage Council and the Sydney City Council will act to ensure the QVB is preserved for future generations. Especially at a time when our history and memories are disappearing rapidly thanks to out-of-control, profit-first development.

I strongly oppose the proposal to replace the QVB’s coloured glass with clear glass. These panes are not a superficial design choice; they are an integral artistic and historic element of one of Sydney’s most important heritage buildings. Altering them for short-term commercial convenience would permanently diminish the character, atmosphere, and civic value of the QVB.

The QVB is a landmark, not a generic retail shell. Its appeal lies precisely in the features that distinguish it from modern shopping centres, including its coloured glazing. Changing a heritage masterpiece to suit individual tenants sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the City of Sydney’s responsibility to protect our shared cultural assets.

I urge Council to reject this proposal and preserve the QVB’s fabric for current and future generations.

I object to the development application to replace the coloured glass at the Market Street end of the Queen Victoria Building (QVB) with clear glazing. The QVB is one of Sydney’s most important heritage landmarks and a defining feature of the CBD, valued not only for its structure but for the integrity of its original design, materials and visual character. The coloured glass is an integral architectural element that contributes to the building’s historic identity, streetscape presence and distinction from contemporary retail developments. Removing it for commercial leasing preferences would cause irreversible heritage loss and prioritise short-term retail trends over long-term public value.

The QVB’s enduring appeal and economic success come from its historic character, not from conformity to modern retail display expectations. Heritage controls exist to protect landmark buildings from piecemeal change, and adaptive reuse must respect, not dilute, their defining features. For these reasons, this application should be refused to safeguard the QVB’s architectural integrity and cultural importance to Sydney.

Absolutely ludicrous to even consider such a request. Sydney has so few heritage buildings and this marvellous example of fine architecture must be protected at all costs. Whenever I am in the City I always head to the QVB, not for the shopping, but to take in the wonderful atmosphere and splendour, true artisans like this no longer exist and it should be cherished in it’s entirety. Changing the colour of even one panel of glass would destroy it’s integrity. One can only hope that the Sydney City Council adhere to their own policies of protecting heritage listed properties and their duty to their citizens to protect and serve the interests of the community. Any retailer should be grateful to have the privilege to display their products in such an elegant backdrop.

Please don't get rid of the stained glass windows on the QVB! They're beautiful!

Given how close this city came to losing one of its most beautiful architectural gems with the QVB, and our appalling history of tearing down beautiful buildings in the alleged name of progress (remember The Regent Theatre, just for starters) this proposal is utterly bewildering, nonsensical and unfounded. The specious arguments about high-end retailers losing visibility from a few panes of coloured glass at the top of shopfronts sound highly improbable and lack authentic detail, starting with the names of these alleged retailers who exited rental agreements. Why would a high-end retailer need customers to have an unimpeded view of the ceiling of their store? The coloured glass in no way obstructs eye level appreciation of window displays or shop/brand presence. Profoundly undermining this argument is the fact that the applicant also prepared the Heritage Impact Statement, so not surprisingly finds no issue with ripping out the coloured glass panes. On that basis alone, this application should be rejected by council as a massive conflict of interest and an independent assessment of the heritage impact sought. Irrespective of any independent report, is the deeply offensive proposal that high-end retailers dictate the aesthetics of our city, let alone have a say in the invaluable fabric of our built history. If your high-end product sales are impacted by panes of coloured glass, then I would argue the product is the problem, not the glass. Council must reject this application in its entirety, and seek heritage listings of every single element of the QVB to prevent such nonsense applications in the future.

Please do not change a piece of iconic look of this building to please corporations. Businesses come and go, get sold and get bought, and the building has been here for a long time - it deserves to be preserved and appreciated exactly the way it was meant to be. I have never had a thought walking past a store in QVB that a coloured glass doesn't make me appealed to go into the store. What I appreciate is how modernity and heritage blends together.

I strongly oppose the proposal to alter the heritage glass at the QVB. Removing heritage for supposed commercial gain is not acceptable. The QVB is a beautiful building, much loved by Sydneysiders, and should be robustly protected. If the Vicinity Group is having difficulty attracting tenants, might I suggest they are not targeting the correct market. Might I also remind the City of Sydney that we are a country that exercises the power of the vote.

Please think of Sydney’s heritage and do not replace windows with clear glass but restore the old stained glass windows. I am sure there are “special people” who would love to tackle the magnificent windows and restore them. I have taken my grandsons to the Queen Victoria Building with the sole reason being to admire these windows. PLEASE DO NOT REPLACE THEM WITH ALTERNATIVES. THEY ARE BEAUTIFUL AS THEY ARE. Thank you. Mimi Neave at Waverton

I strongly object to this development application. The shopfronts although not original are styled in the heritage style of the original building and should be retained for that purpose. The application seems to be directed purely at the economic/commercial viewpoint of being able to attract tenants. This is not an adequate reason for destroying the beauty of such an iconic heritage location in Sydney. The coloured glass is at a height that does not disrupt the view inside the shop, which is required for retailers. The heritage report accompanying the application is prepared by the actual applicant and should have been prepared by a proper heritage expert/consultant. Regardless, it bears no real reason to allow the application. Please ensure that the beautiful QVB building retains its charm by retaining these coloured glass windows. They are in critical and important locations of this landmark building.

Please do not alter our stunning, heritage building for the supposed 'benefit' of businesses who have a fleeting interest in the property, over the historical and cultural significance of the QVB for generations of Australians. The coloured glass is part of the QVB's charm and is a replica of the original colours and designs of late Victorian buildings. The glass preserves not only the historical design of the QVB, but an entire architectural period. Any brand would be lucky to be part of the QVB's history and they are the ones who should be adapting their fit outs to this significant and beautiful building - not our building adapting to fit the desires of a brand.

I am opposed to the idea of changing the glass in the QVB. The QVB is an important part of Sydney’s heritage and should be protected as such. The idea of changing part of such a historically valuable building for the sake of enabling already wealthy and well-known global luxury brands slightly more visibility is problematic at best. I’m concerned about the heritage impact of this suggestion as well as the fact that the QVB is a beloved Sydney icon that should not be changed.

What a preposterous application! I urge Sydney City Council to reject this proposal and not bend to the passing whims of commercial interests. The QVB is an iconic heritage building and means a lot to the people of Sydney and wider Australia. It has been beautifully and authentically restored and is under heritage order for good reasons. It’s a physical record of our historical past, is of architectural significance and has an important sense of place in the heart of our city.
None of these values should be compromised by tampering with the curated materials of this building.
The full extent of the heritage protection orders should be exercised to stop this ridiculous, short sighted request from going ahead!

It's a beautiful, iconic heritage building which draws millions of patrons and tourists. It should be preserved as it is. It hasn't been an issue until now, if some tenants don't like it then perhaps they should vacate and let businesses that appreciate its heritage and culture take up residence.
If council are even considering allowing this its a complete failure on their part and a disgrace.

Absolutely not. Don't let our beautiful city's heritage be eroded for the sake of corporate greed. No more soulless, homogenised concrete and glass.

Please deny this proposal. Taxpayers are not in favour of paying to strip back the character of an iconic city landmark to appease bullying luxury brands. Don't sell out the building design so they can eke out a meter more of advertising space. They can deal as they have been doing since the 1970s/80s.

This proposal should be denied. These brands are unlikely to have a tenure that matches the history of the QVB. Millions visit for its restored heritage appeal, which is comparable to luxury venues such as Galeries Lafayette Paris and London's Burlington Arcade.

I find it hard to believe retailers plan to put anything up there in those windows other than lighting tracks and dusty display cables. Regardless of being a pretty soulless suggestion to remove something unique to a building that draws in both visitors and locals, can guarantee it will detract from the exterior look and other tenants will not be prepared for the top half of their store to be exposed. QVB and the Strand have managed to make the boutique experience still feel exciting. You don’t visit the QVB to go to one shop, there’s always another one on Pitt St, you go for the building. I can walk along George st just fine but I always choose to pass through the QVB instead, and probably spend much longer than I intended along the way.

I object to the application of removing the stained glass of the iconic heritage building. A creative person is able to use their existing space to promote their brand effectively. The stained glass is part of the building, once removed, it is harder to bring them back and other shop would want to take the stained glasses down and altered the building’s look. Sydney has a lot of generic blue tainted tall buildings that resembles nothing unique about the city and I would hate to see beautiful QVB of the city’s past being chipped away over time with applications such as this.

I object to the proposal to remove the stained glass windows from the QVB. We are not the owners of heritage buildings, but the custodians of sites that will long outlast the people and brands that reside within them. All parts of the QVB should be retained for future generations. Shops that are unable to take advantage of the significant charm of the building are welcome to open in a Westfield.

This is such a terrible proposal - to remove those historic transoms that have zero impact on their branding is a crime. Once you remove those glass panels, you will never be able to replace them like for like. Please reject this, and keep our heritage buildings intact, we're already losing our historic identity, so chip away more needlessly.

How can anyone destroy a Heritage listed Building by taking out the stained Glass Windows that have been there for many years. Once gone cannot be replaced. It will take away the beauty of the building which was saved many years ago. There is not one good thing about taking out stained glass windows in a heritage building and replacing them with glass. I am sure people can see the products when looking in the windows . There is no good reason at all to take out these beautiful stained glass windows.

Retailers come and go, this building is enjoyed by everyone who visits Sydney. Heritage should not be destroyed because a business has decided that an utterly gorgeous feature isn't to their liking.

Outrageous! In a day and age where heritage buildings need to be saved, yet are being demolished nation wide, the wider community and institutions of authority need to make a stronger effort to save physical history (buildings, sacred sites, etc). If the stained glass disappears, then what is stopping demolishing proposals or anything else? It's unscrubbing everything gained and all heritage laws changed by saving the building (and those similar) in the 80s!

Brands should not be able to even lodge the change of heritage to suit their greed. Globally, sales are declining as the cost of living crisis rapidly becomes worse. Thus, stock sales drop cause people can't buy brands. These brands are therefore using the stained glass windows of the qvb as an excuse to save money, that is otherwise lost in unsold stock.

I object to changing the coloured stained glass windows to clear.

The coloured stained glass brings interest, history and international renown to Sydney and QVB.

It should not be replaced by plain glass to suit tenants because the glass is currently placed so high up that their merchandise wouldn't even be visible and have minimal impact on sales.

If the tenants have a problem with it they should find another location.

They should also consider if this DA is pursued, it damages their own brands to knowingly contribute to wrecking heritage as the beneficiaries would be quite clear.

These stained glass windows show character, heritage, history. To remove them for the monetary gain of large corporate conglomerates would be a grave mistake and an absolute shame.

This planning request should be denied as it is not in keeping with the heritage nature of the QVB, one of the most iconic brownstone buildings in Sydney. The QVB has such history and legacy as a design icon in our beautiful city, a city that is already actively destroying it's built heritage and architecture for.modern commercialism and profit. Businesses who actively sign leases knowing the heritage nature of the building should have no ability to change that heritage nature. The city houses many other modern building they could relocate too if they are that woddired about profit margin and sales. Time to actively decline multi-national with no commitment to local engagement from destroying what's locally valued by the community for its beauty and heritage

Removing the glass stain removes what makes qvb an unique landmark in Sydney so I don't support this planning request

I really like the stained glass on the QVB, it would reflect poorly on the city of Sydney if they were removed.

I object to the coloured windows at the QVB being removed. Especially for the purpose of displaying goods for sale. This is a ludicrous request and is an insult to common sense let alone losing more of the heritage of this country. This building is beautiful and has survived a potential demolition in the 1960’s. Maintaining the heritage and building integrity such as the coloured windows is essential and the request to remove the coloured windows must be objected to by the City of Sydney as the custodian of this building.

When my friend from Japan came over to Sydney, I asked her what she liked about the city and she remarked how beautiful the historical buildings were and how she appreciated the city's maintenance of their heritage buildings in comparison to her home city.

Please don't remove these beautiful windows. To alter a piece of its structure is to alter a part of its identity. Also these windows are not obstructing any view of the retailer's merchandise either.

Having these old buildings with their sustained features adds Sydney's history and beauty, whether it be as obvious as its Romanesque Revival style or as subtle as its coloured windows. It is what brings many a tourist or local over as a welcome change amongst the sea of new developments. I highly doubt that the removal of these beautiful windows would boost global brand sales in any way.

This proposal makes no sense. As it is we are losing many of our heritage buildings and our heritage. Changing the coloured glass panes to satisfy a commercial need should not even be considered. Sydney is slowly becoming colourless and souless. Don’t let the coloured panes be replaced by bland plain glass.

Objection to Proposed External Alterations – QVB Market Street Tenancies (G-001 and G-002)
I strongly object to the proposed removal and replacement of the existing coloured glass within the transom windows to the ground floor Market Street tenancies with “Starphire Ultra-Clear Glass (or the like)”.
The Queen Victoria Building is one of Sydney’s most cherished and recognisable heritage icons. It is not simply a retail space, but a living reminder of Sydney’s architectural, cultural and social history. Visitors from across Australia and overseas make a deliberate journey to the QVB to experience the “old world” character of Sydney — its craftsmanship, detailing, colour, and atmosphere — elements that are increasingly rare in modern urban environments.
The existing coloured glass forms part of this heritage character. It contributes to the richness, warmth and visual complexity of the façade and interior experience, reinforcing the historic identity of the building. Removing these elements in favour of ultra-clear, contemporary glazing would result in an irreversible erosion of the building’s heritage fabric and aesthetic significance.
Replacing heritage glazing to suit the visual branding or operational preferences of what is, in effect, fast fashion or short-term retail use sets a dangerous precedent. Commercial tenancies are transient by nature; the heritage value of the QVB is not. Alterations of this nature prioritise short-term commercial trends over long-term cultural stewardship.
The Heritage Act 1977 exists to protect places of state significance from incremental change that, over time, strips away their authenticity. This proposal does exactly that — removing historic detail to create a homogenised retail frontage indistinguishable from any modern shopping centre. Once these details are lost, they cannot be meaningfully replaced.
The QVB’s success lies precisely in its difference from contemporary retail environments. Its layered history, decorative elements and traditional materials are what make it special, memorable and worthy of preservation. Allowing the removal of coloured glass undermines the very qualities that attract visitors and contribute to Sydney’s cultural identity.
For these reasons, I urge the consent authority to refuse this aspect of the application and to uphold the intent of the Heritage Act by protecting the original character, materials and visual integrity of the Queen Victoria Building.
Once heritage is removed, it cannot be recreated. We must not allow a globally recognised historic landmark to be incrementally diminished for short-term commercial convenience.

Please deny this proposal, the glass panes are beautiful and a valuable heritage asset for the Sydney CBD. It is possible to find large clear glass panels with retail shops in many locations and shopping malls, but the character and heritage of the QVB, including the beautiful coloured glass, is what makes the Sydney CBD unique and special. I do not feel that it is reasonable to claim that it obscures the merchandise, there is a lot of foot traffic in this area in part because of the atmosphere and beautiful surroundings of the heritage QVB building characteristics.

The QVB building is one of Sydney’s landmark buildings.
As a Sydneysider I enjoy shopping or walking through the building when taking a train.
The enjoyment is that it is not a modern building but a beautiful historic building with traditional elements of which the stained glass windows are one of the architectural features.
Ruining a building for store holders is not what we want. They may not renew their leases but we will still be visiting the building.

The stained glass panes are an integral part of the heritage fabric and local character of the QVB. It would be short sighted for the Council to cave in to the unreasonable requests of luxury brand leaseholders (who should not determine the external fabric of a hertiage listed building!). Please deny this proposal, as it would be detrimental for sydneysiders who enjoy the historical charm of the building, cheapen the overall look and once again show that the City of Sydney has little regard for long term heritage objectives. It is unreasonable for leaseholders to claim that the stained glass obscures merchandise, there is ample viewing space through the existing clear panes of glass. There is significant foot traffic in this area in part because of the atmosphere and beautiful surroundings of the heritage QVB building characteristics.

Please preserve one of the loveliest heritage buildings in the Sydney CBD. The stained glass windows provide so much character and heart to the area, it would be devastating to lose something so special to more grey in the CBD for the sake of more advertising space. If prospective tenants want blander spaces with less character there are plenty of more modern, plain and brutalist concrete spaces around. The QVB means a great deal to locals and tourists alike, especially with its iconic windows that appear magical in low light. Such a move to remove the windows will also be out of character with the rest of the building and heritage nature of the building. Please help protect the integrity of this building that brings charm to the CBD shopping area for locals and tourists, helping define Australia’s CBDs.

The Queen Victoria Building is a magnificent iconic building that was thankfully saved and restored after years of neglect and use as a rabbit warren of offices. She stands proud as an example of historic Sydney architecture which should not be compromised at the whim of retailers trying to sell products.
Please maintain the beauty and integrity of the QVB by denying the application to replace the coloured windows as proposed by the current tenants of the retail space.

The proposal to remove and replace this coloured glass with modern ultra‑clear glazing would result in an unacceptable loss of heritage fabric. It would diminish the authenticity of the façade, disrupt the established visual rhythm of the building, and erode the heritage significance that the Act seeks to protect. Such an intervention is inconsistent with the principles of minimal change, reversibility, and retention of original material that underpin best‑practice heritage conservation.

The proposed works appear to prioritise commercial visibility over heritage protection, contrary to the obligations associated with an Integrated Development affecting a State‑listed heritage item. The stained glass needs to be protected!

This is just so wrong in many levels, why even entertain such a ridiculous idea?
The QVB is heritage listed - the street frontage and visible exterior elements must be preserved to maintain the building's historical identity.
Protect The QVB!

The stained glass windows are a unique and iconic feature of the QVB. They bring an old world charm that differentiates it from the rest of the buildings in the CBD. To remove them would be making QVB bland and less recognisable - to lose its charm over some retailers demands?? I think not. Spending isn’t down because we can’t see through the top bit of the window, it’s for many other reasons. Leave our beloved QVB intact!

Please do no remove historic beauty. The stain glass is part of what makes QVB such a beautiful historical and iconic building.

I sincerely hope this proposal is rejected soundly, the QVB is an iconic location in our city and to cannibalise its facade for commerce is frankly galling. This building and its impact will continue to stretch far further into the future than the current tenants leases will, they’re not worth changing such an important piece of our history.

Why is Sydney's heritage being warped by brands? The stained glass isn't a surprise for the tenants, and the architecture and stained glass is much of the appeal of visitors and customers to the QVB!

Thank you for this opportunity for input. The windows on the QVB throughout the whole building are integral to the history and design of this iconic, majestic piece of Sydney’s history. Decades ago there was a hard fought battle to save the whole of the QVB, to keep the building as intact as viable. It is unimaginable that something as important as the coloured glass could be removed. It is the third ‘must see’ after our Opera House and Harbours Bridge in Sydney to international and interstate visitors and must be protected. Thank you

Please do not destroy the architectural heritage of our beautiful city. Brands/shops/tenants will come and go and they should not dictate such significant changes which destroy the beauty and history of our city. These stained glass windows have no impact on the sales of the shops which choose to tenant these shop fronts, there are many many reasons why sales might be down, for anyone to suggest they do is just ridiculous. Sales are down worldwide - people are tired of spending their hard earned money on material things that cost and arm and a leg.

As an educator, we teach the students of the importance of things like the "Green bans" which saved so much of Sydney's heritage, including the QVB itself. The idea that "high end luxury brands" believe they have the right to impact the critical heritage of the city for their own marketing is absurd. The QVB is a protected landmark for a reason. These brands are often the same ones that choose to exclude who can and cannot enter their premises based off prestige. They add little by way of culture, and I highly doubt their revenue is impacted by the wonderful façade of the QVB itself.

Keep the QVB transom windows as is in their coloured glass. It's an icon of a building, a gorgeous building that should be kept as it is. I love to admire the architecture when I go there as do many visitors. City of Sydney don't buckle under pressure to allow an unnecessary change. I highly doubt changing the coloured glass to clear would impact the success or failure of a business. These windows appear quite high up so not sure what benefit clear glass would be. The main windows are clearly visible to show what's in store. The building isn't the issue, maybe it's just the business's and what they sell and their costs. City of Sydney preserve our heritage

The coloured glass windows of the QVB are part of what makes it recognisable and stand out amongst the skyscraper landscape of Sydney city. It's part of the reason why both tourists and locals stop on the street to take pictures. I, personally, stand by the windows of the light rail every time I travel through to look at the beautiful coloured glass fly past. It's a complete fallacy that the presence of the coloured glass would stop customers from shopping in the building, but rather that it encourages people to enter the beautifully designed building. Please listen to the public and the people who walk these streets every day and keep the gorgeous state of the building intact.

Re: Objection to Development Application D/2025/1211 – External Alterations to the Queen Victoria Building (QVB), 429-481 George Street, Sydney

I am writing to formally object to the above development application, which proposes replacing the coloured glass in the transom windows of the ground floor Market Street tenancies (G-001 and G-002) with clear glass (‘Starphire Ultra-Clear Glass or the like’). As a resident of Sydney deeply concerned with the preservation of our city’s heritage, I believe this alteration would irreparably harm the aesthetic and historical integrity of the Queen Victoria Building, a State heritage-listed icon.

The QVB, designed by architect George McRae and opened in 1898 to commemorate Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee, is renowned for its elaborate Romanesque Revival architecture, including its magnificent stained and coloured glass features. These elements contribute significantly to the building’s heritage value, as recognized in its listing on the NSW State Heritage Register in 2010. The register’s statement of significance highlights the QVB’s unique architectural style, scale, craftsmanship, and its role as a symbol of heritage conservation in Sydney, particularly following public outcry that saved it from demolition in the 1970s and led to its restoration in the 1980s. The coloured glass in question is not merely decorative but integral to the building’s facade, enhancing its visual appeal and historical authenticity. Replacing it with clear glass would diminish this aesthetic value, making the QVB resemble any generic modern retail space and eroding what makes it a must-see attraction for millions of visitors annually.

The justifications provided in the application’s Heritage Impact Statement (HIS) prioritize short-term commercial interests over sound heritage conservation principles. For instance, the HIS cites demands from global brands, including a flagship lifestyle brand insisting on a $300,000 termination payment if clear glass is not installed, a luxury jewellery brand exiting negotiations due to the coloured glazing, and a prospective tenant offering $1,050,000 less in annual rent because of it. These arguments are flimsy and unsubstantiated, reflecting a narrow focus on profit rather than the building’s cultural significance. It is particularly concerning that the HIS was not prepared by respected heritage consultants like GBA Heritage, who have a longstanding relationship with the QVB, but appears to be influenced by the applicant, Vicinity Group, creating a potential conflict of interest. Global retailers’ reluctance to adapt to the building’s heritage features should not dictate alterations to a publicly valued asset; instead, tenants should be selected who appreciate and enhance the QVB’s unique character.
Furthermore, approving this change would set a dangerous precedent for other heritage sites in Sydney, encouraging further modifications driven by commercial pressures rather than conservation needs. The QVB’s survival through economic recessions, demolition threats, and restorations underscores its resilience and importance to Sydney’s identity. In an era where heritage tourism boosts the local economy, preserving features like the coloured glass aligns with broader sustainability and cultural goals, rather than catering to transient retail trends.

I urge the City of Sydney Council to reject this application in full and protect the QVB’s heritage for future generations. Should approval be considered, I request that any decision be subject to independent heritage assessment and public consultation to ensure transparency.
Thank you for considering my objection. I am available to discuss this matter further if required.

Yours sincerely,

The coloured glass add interest and beauty to an iconic Sydney building. Brands are keen to maintain a store precisely becasue it has so much character and people feel that shopping there is a luxury experience. Additionally I find it offensive that a group of corporations feel that they can suck all the colour and character out of a building rather than face up to any of their own shortcomings. This is Sydney, where we celebrate individuality and our vibrant culture, not a mega mall.

This building is, and has always been, one of my favourite parts of Sydney. It's such a beautiful building and part of history.
I go to the QVB because of the building and stained glass windows and have a look around at the stores/shops that I wouldn't otherwise.
I think this building attracts customers rather than detracts customers, if there were plain glass windows people would just walk on by. If anyone has a shop in the QVB and feels that the stained glass windows detract customers and affect marketing etc then the QVB isn't the place for them, rather than trying to fit a building to a few people the right people will fit this building and there are many people who would love to have a store there.
Please do not change this building or the windows and leave it so next generations can experience and be captured by the same beauty that has captured my attention and heart and the people in my family before me.

As tennis great John McEnroe said "YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS". QVB is a beautiful heritage building that is a Sydney icon. If a retailer doesn't like the current lighting because of the beautiful stained glass then they should lease elsewhere.

I think it is absolutely disgusting that it’s even a possibility that the beautiful glass windows will be taken down to boost retail sales! This is an important part of sydney’s heritage and the benefit to commercial real estate and profits should absolutely not take precedence over the beauty and history of our great city.

Please don’t compromise a heritage building - one of the most iconic in Sydney! - to pander to shortsighted retailers. It’s your role to preserve our heritage, not to prop up extremely wealthy retailers who want to turn the QVB into another bland shop window. This is a beautiful building which sees may visitors through its doors. Many for the heritage features as well as retailers.
Please leave it as it is.

Completely inappropriate to use tax payer dollars to remove the coloured glass at the QVB. I’m sure when this glass was installed (the 80’s I think) it would have cost a large amount of money and to now consider it’s appropriate to change it on a whim at the request of a global retailer because they cannot brand their store as they would like??? Unbelievably soft stance and definitely based on the $$.
Disappointing to say the least.

This submission should be vigorously rejected. The QVB is one of Sydney’s prime heritage buildings and should not be altered to suit some global designer houses.   Their merchandise is very visible from the street, the glass does not need to be removed to improve visibility.  These businesses have their stores in the QVB as it is a prestige site and they knew what the appearance of their stores and merchandise would be like, because of the glass, before they entered into a rental agreement.   If they can afford the QVB rent, they can afford modern rental premises elsewhere where the glass front is clear. 

Please do not change the beautiful coloured glass in the qvb.

Aesthetics in our city are important. History is important.
Heritage is important.
I do believe that the large brands have enough visibility through the existing windows. The external beauty of the QVB encourages visitors to explore inside.
A brand should not be allowed to change our buildings history
As humans we are more than mere consumers of brands.

I am writing to strongly object to this proposal to replace the heritage coloured glass windows at the QVB with clear glass.

The QVB is a State heritage-listed landmark and its original architectural features, including the coloured transom windows,
are vital to its historical integrity. Replacing heritage materials with modern glass to suit individual commercial retailers is short-sighted and sets a dangerous precedent for the gradual destruction of the building's character.

The public value of Sydney’s most iconic heritage building must be prioritised over the temporary visibility preferences of high-end retailers. I urge the Council to reject this application and preserve the building's aesthetic and historical significance.

This application is truly absurd. The heritage window panels of this fine building should not be a thing open for debate to appease greedy multinationals. The argument given is ludicrous and has no validity.

The dangerous thing here is if this is changed for such pointless and trivial reasons where does it stop if the tenants don’t like other heritage aspects of the building that in no way impede their ability to trade.

Leave this beautiful heritage building alone and be grateful that your brand is part of its rich history.

The stained glass hardly obstructs view into shopfronts and arguably the heritage preservation and beauty attracts more foot traffic boosting potential for sales

As one of Sydney’s most significant heritage landmarks, the QVB and its stained glass windows are defining elements of its historical, architectural, and cultural value. These windows are not merely decorative features; they constitute integral heritage fabric that contributes directly to the building’s authenticity, character, and sense of place. Clear glass simply cannot replicate the visual richness, craftsmanship, or historic character embodied in the existing stained glass.

Allowing this application would result in an unnecessary and irreversible detriment to the QVB’s historic character for the sake of miserly corporate gain. The arguments presented by the retailers in support of this proposal are baseless and misguided, prioritising minor commercial interests over heritage conservation.

Ruining the façade of an iconic historic building to create additional “advertising space” with clear windows for these retailers is entirely inappropriate and should not be permitted in these circumstances.

The justification for destroying the beauty and heritage of the QVB is weak at best. No retailers are hanging displays so high in their window, so this is just a power play from the labels.
Let’s learn from our past mistakes of destroying our heritage buildings!
If London Department stores like Liberty and Fortnum & Mason are not required to destroy their heritage windows, and are able to attract top clients, then why is this being asked of the QVB?

The idea that a historical and heritage listed building in Sydney can have vital parts of it removed for the sake of consumerism and capitalism is absurd. The windows suggested for removal are significantly out of the line of sight and I believe that replacing them with clear windows will have insignificant improvement to the businesses. In fact I would dare suggest that it will reduce the amount of people shopping in these stores. The QVB is such a beautiful building and I have heard international friends speak of going there and taking their families there. By taking away such a beautiful component there is the potential of reducing foot traffic in the retail stores in the building. There are plenty of better places to shop, people go there because of its beauty. The application does not supply sufficient information as to how the windows impact business to such a significant extent that it justifies modifying a heritage building. The windows at street level have the coloured glass at the top, well above eye level, the rest of the window is very easy to look through. This is a poor excuse for poorly run businesses to extort the government for money to exit their contracts. The city has plenty of stores, but unique and heritage listed buildings are becoming few and far. I seriously question a government that approves this request.

When buyers purchase buildings with historical significance they do so knowing it’s heritage status which includes strict regulations that prevent any alterations to its identifying features.
To remove these recognisable stained glass windows will erase its unique identity and historical beauty that influences locals and tourists to visit this iconic building.
The owners knew it was of heritage importance when they purchased it and took it on regardless so they should understand the rules surrounding it. Rules need to be enforced to protect our architectural history for future generations to come. I object to this proposal.

The stained hlass adds to the building's charm. It's beautiful, bright, and looks timeframe appropriate for this building. Having retailers put their ads or merchandise instead will take awa from the unique old look and make it look more like Westfield. All the tourists visiting QVB go there for the original look, not because they see items for sale. They can purchase them elsewhere.

Please leave the QVB as it is.
People travel far and wide to visit beautiful buildings like this, heritage buildings should not be changed the building is what draws me in not the designer stores changing the windows or the building in anyway will deter me from visiting Sydney.

If the designer stores dont like the windows they should move elsewhere, there are plenty of other boring buildings in the city they could set up.

Demanding to destroy part of the heritage of a space that they chose to rent is wild behaviour. In a world of grey, blue, black and white buildings the QVB is a glorious splash of colour and heritage. Please don’t ruin that for companies that aren’t Australian owned and obviously don’t care about our city or heritage.
Furthermore, the stained glass doesn’t block anything at eye level. This sounds like a shot at cheaper rent (which for local owned businesses would almost be worth having a discussion about) but overseas luxury brands can go set up shop somewhere else. The Australian people don’t want to foot the bill for their reduced rents or the removal of the glass.

I visit the QVB at least once a week and always admire the stained glass that was installed in the 1980’s as part of a restoration intended to reflect the building’s original features. The fact that the QVB continues to attract both local and international visitors is testament to its importance within Sydney’s cultural heritage. The charm of the building attracts customers to the retail tenants. Further, the height at which the coloured glass is installed does not obscure the retail spaces and I believe does not result in any financial hardship. The coloured glass should be retained as is.

Please reject this proposal! There is no logical reason to remove or replace the stained glass. It does not impeede in any way as it’s not like ppl are that tall to be able to look through from the high top of the building. It makes no sense that some international brands would want to ruin and change the look of our historical building, if they don’t like they can simply vacate the building and rent elsewhere. I commute daily for work and seeing the stained glass and everything that has been built within this beautiful structure is special to me and for many other Aussies that come here

The QVB is visited because it's a beautiful building, not because of the global brands and their window displays. The beauty of the building lures the public in, not the shopping displays.
A heritage listing is to protect the site from inappropriate development. This application request is insignificant and would severely negatively impact the beauty and history of the QVB and Sydney city.

I completely object to the idea of removing the coloured glass in the QVB. That glass accentuates the beauty of the building and I cannot believe the idea is even being entertained. I visit alot and the idea that the coloured glass, that is quite high up on the window, is impeding anyone's view of what is within the store is ridiculous.. people aren't spending the money on your over priced items because they are too focused on feeding their family. If this is approved it's an absolute disgrace.

Calling for the City of Sydney to decline this application. It poses a risk to the heritage and charm of the Queen Victoria Building. The stained glass windows are a key part of its facade and contribute to its attraction and design which’s draws people to this iconic structure.

What an absolute joke of an application. You can see in the shops quite fine its all Richie rich junk . Leave the building alone its prettier than any shop inside it dont like it find another location and leave our heritage listed building alone!

Those coloured glass panels are part of the history and character of the QVB, that shouldn't be removed. Those stores signed their leases with knowledge that the glass was there. They should not be allowed to request the removal of part of the character of the building. If the glass was posing a health and safety risk then perhaps the argument could be made for their removal.

As someone who is in Town Hall regularly for work, seeing the beautiful stained glass along the QVB is something that still takes my breath away on a sunny day. Please don't remove that piece of character in our beloved city- let it keep the piece of heritage that so many people adore.

I feel that the colored glass around the outside ground floor of the QVB are a core part of the heritage facade, and should not be removed. the idea that the stained glass which is well above eye level when viewed from the street prevents people seeing inside to any reasonable degree to an extent that the removal of their heritage value is justified is laughable. Please do not allow this distruction of our cities valuable heritage.

Absolutely not. This is atrocious. The QVB is a heritage listed building, and the beauty of that is that it Stays. The. Same. Since 1898. One hundred and twenty seven years and it’s stayed frozen in time. It’s fascinating. I marvelled at it when I was a kid and I still marvel at it today. So many generations of people have passed through those doors. To strip the building of its history now would be a huge mistake. One of the most intriguing aspects of this building is the stained glass windows. They’re such a significant and memorable part of the landmark. They’re the reason that I love stained glass. If these short minded retailers can’t appreciate the value in them, then they should find somewhere else. Some bland, sterile, concrete monstrosity where dreams go to die. At least then their work place will reflect their soul.

Please deny this proposal. This is a feature of the Sydney CBD that brings colour and beauty. No one builds like this anymore and it adds so much to the city. There’s plenty of space in the windows currently for stores to advertise as they have done for years.

Please, please, please, do not allow this! The QVB and the Strand are in a class of their own in terms of heritage shopping centres. Anything that diminishes the heritage character of of these ‘survivors’ would be a tragedy and a great loss to our city. I fear the owners have misunderstood why people are drawn to the QVB. Please don’t let yet another part of our heritage disappear for ever.

Please absolutely do NOT remove these stunning historical pieces. They are part of the beautiful building’s history and removing them for commercial purposes (unjustifiably, given nothing can be seen to buy at that height). This whole thing is truly ludicrous. These retailers moved into the building knowing the windows were there a now shouldn’t be allowed to complain.

I strongly reject this application to alter the QVB windows.

This is an iconic heritage building that attracts so many visitors. It is always busy. There is no case to support the suggestion that the coloured glass impacts business.

Sydney has lost so many beautiful heritage buildings and we nearly lost this one. That it has been so beautifully restored is wonderful.

It is so well- loved by locals and visitors. Please do not change it. To do so would be extremely disappointing.
Kelly

I am writing to formally object to the proposed removal of the stained-glass windows at the Queen Victoria Building for the following reasons:
Loss of Heritage Significance: The QVB is a State Heritage-listed item. The multicoloured glass is a key element of the building's original design. While the current glass is a 1980s reconstruction, it faithfully maintains the building's historical integrity.
Impact on Visual Character: The proposal to replace these iconic features with clear glass to improve retail visibility will devalue the character of the site. The glass provides a unique aesthetic that distinguishes the QVB from modern shopping centres.
Commercial Interest vs. Public Good: The building is heritage protected for the purpose of preserving its special character for the people of Sydney (and all visitors) to enjoy. The clear glass will be used for advertising for the benefit of commercial brands.
I urge the City of Sydney and the Local Planning Panel to reject this application in its entirety to ensure the QVB remains a complete and authentic example of Sydney's architectural history.

I object to this application. There is sufficient clear window space in the current building. The panel should reject this application.

I'm fundamentally opposed to this proposal. This is a wonderful piece of architecture in a city that is increasingly losing its architectural soul. Why destroy an historic feature that brings joy and curiosity to so many? Let's be better.

Please reject the application to replace the coloured windows with plain glass. I understand the need to compete with the blandification of modern shopping centres and have sympathy for tenants/landlord, but the character of the QVB (as well as other beautiful spaces such as the Strand Arcade) are what makes coming to Sydney CBD unique and memorable. We can go to a Westfield anywhere and have the same experience; there is nothing else like the QVB and that is the draw card. If I don't shop in the impacted shops, it's not because of the coloured glass - it's such an eyecatching building that it draws the attention to the shops inside. Please leave it colourful, we love it that way. Thank you

Please let common sense prevail here. The QVB is a beautiful building and the coloured glass contributes greatly to this. Seeing it replaced by corporate branding would be incredibly sad.

Is it Council’s mission to continually destroy our City’s heritage to satisfy business & developer’s interests? The stained glass does not detract from the desirability of goods displayed behind those windows. Please leave the QVB Building and its’ lovely windows as is! This application is just nonsense and doesn’t serve the public interest.

I object to this application.

The QVB is a beautiful part of Sydney’s heritage. Retail tenants should not be allowed to change the facade of this amazing building in any way and have plenty of other options if it doesn’t meet their needs.

I object to the application to remove the coloured windows at the QVB. No one is forcing businesses to rent there. I’ve lived in Sydney for 30 years now and visit the QVB regularly - and bring international visitors as well - it is a sight to behold and a true highlight of the Sydney streetscape. There are endless other boring, clear windowed shops that can be leased if businesses must have all their wares displayed at all times. As it stands the QVB is the city’s most beautiful and enormous jewelery box (chocolate box? treasure chest?) Wanting to look inside is part of the shopping experience! As for the interior shopping experience, the removal of the coloured glass will surely negatively impact the luxurious feel and stunning filtered coloured light coming into the shops.

I believe it’s important the coloured glass be retained as it’s a distinguishing heritage feature of the building.

This proposal should be rejected.

If a global retail brand is "seeking a flagship tenancy outside of Pitt Street Malls", their goal is a central location which provides character for a memorable retail experience - that is what the QVB provides. It is a place of invaluable cultural significance to the City of Sydney and a drawcard for international visitors. It should not be compromised at the whims of individual tenants.

The Heritage Impact Statement acknowledges that the existing 1980s coloured glass shopfronts, whilst reconstructions, are "solutions to restore some of the lost heritage fabric and Federation character of the original shopfronts". And yet it says their removal will be of "limited significance". The HIS is inadequate and its sole justification is commercial viability.

A significant point is that amending three of the George Street window bays to clear glass will result in an unbalanced look for the QVB for the entire George St side. It would be of significant detriment to the heritage character of the entire building.

A day in the city always includes a visit to the beautiful QVB. This lovely place brings joy to so many Sydneysiders and tourists. We just cannot lose any more beauty and history in this city. High end global retailers are already beyond the reach of most local visitors to the QVB. Why must they take something precious and lovely from us? Please please do not allow this selfish and unkind plan to go ahead.

I strongly reject this proposal. The appearance of the historic and beautiful Queen Victoria Building should not be changed. The coloured glass gives character to the building. City of Sydney, please reject this proposal. The QVB is my favourite building in Sydney, and we have already lost so many historic buildings due to greed. The QVB and The Strand Arcade are iconic buildings in Sydney and should not be changed to suit retailers or devolopers.

I strongly oppose to removing the beautiful coloured glass panels in the Queen Victoria Building. We have lost so many interesting and heritage buildings in Sydney and continue to see the bland international retailing style that have destroyed other retailing treasures such as David Jones over the last few years.

Removing the glass would signifigantly impact the heritage look and feel of what is a jewel in Sydney's crown.

Please do not allow this vandalism of a historic building to go ahead.
The QVB was almost lost , like so many other buildings were, when mass destruction of our city's history was considered "progress".
This building is one of Sydney's drawcards for both tourists and residents.
Its beauty is reliant on the elegant melding of stone, coloured glass, and ironwork.
Modern glass, no matter how "crystal clear", has a place in this architectural style.

The argument put forward by the applicant is specious to say the least.
Shoppers do not spend their time craning their necks upwards to look at goods on display at a height as they walk past or windowshop, they look into windows at eye level.

I request that you decline this application and, if necessary, lock in more stringent regulations to protect the integrity of this, and other important buildings , under your juridiction.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this ludicrous request.
Judith Byron .

This proposal seeks to alter elements assessed to be of moderate significance in the 2019 Urbis management plan. ("Visual appearance of the
shopfronts to exterior from ground floor.")

The current shopfronts, though not original, are described as "fundamentally sympathetic to the significance of the building". The highlight windows, which are the element which would be changed, comprise two rows of cathedral glass. The description of the original shopfronts in the 2019 Urbis plan states that "The lower panel, containing coloured cathedral glass, was about twice as deep and contained
a central ventilation grill." Thus, coloured cathedral glass was an integral aspect of the original shopfronts, and surely an important part of the assessment of the 1980s
reconstruction as "sympathetic".

As an element of moderate significance, the management plan states that "Adaptation and relocation to components of these elements and spaces is acceptable provided that it protects the overall cultural significance of the item". I believe that removing the coloured glass goes beyond "adaptation" and, given that coloured glass was an important aspect of the original shopfronts, that removing it would compromise the cultural and heritage significance of the item.

Furthermore, Policy 63 of the management plan states that "Reconstructed fabric should be generally retained if it contributes to the overall consistency
and quality of the interiors, spaces and exterior façades. Changes to reconstructed fabric are
acceptable provided the overall consistency, quality and imagery is retained." The presence of coloured glass is an important part of the imagery and quality of the external shopfronts, which would be diminished through its removal; as such this proposal does not seem to comply with the policy.

I would therefore suggest that the application be denied.

I do not support this application of changing such a rich Heritage of Sydney and one of the most iconic building. Australia is proud of its heritage and should continue to do so. I walk past the QVB every day for work and I am so proud of the heritage buildings in CBD. The coloured glass only covers top 20-25% of the surface area and rest of the glass is transparent for the vendors and tenants to display. If I were a branded tenant, then I would look for ways to blend in and utilize the heritage rather than suggesting to change it.

I am writing to formally object to the proposal to replace the coloured glass transom windows in tenancies G-001 and G-002 with 'Starphire Ultra-Clear Glass'. My objection is based on the following grounds:

Impact on Heritage Significance: The QVB is a landmark of state and national significance. Replacing coloured glass with modern ultra-clear glass constitutes a loss of original (or historically sympathetic) building fabric. This erodes the architectural integrity that the Heritage Act 1977 is designed to protect.

Visual Amenity and Character: The coloured glass is a defining feature of the building’s exterior. It contributes to the "experience of place" for pedestrians and shoppers. Replacing it with clear glass creates a "modern retail" look that is inconsistent with the Romanesque aesthetic of the building.

Absence of Public Benefit: The proposal appears to prioritize the commercial visibility of specific tenancies over the public’s interest in heritage conservation. Given that the QVB currently enjoys high occupancy and vibrant foot traffic, there is no clear economic necessity that justifies such a permanent alteration to the building's facade.

Precedent Setting: Allowing the removal of decorative glass for commercial transparency sets a dangerous precedent for other tenancies within the QVB, potentially leading to the incremental "modernization" and eventual loss of the building’s unique character.

The QVB's coloured glass is not an incidental or decorative addition, it forms an integral part of the building’s architectural language and historic character. These details draw people to the shopfronts and should be regarded as an asset which attracts pedestrians, not an obstruction. Businesses who choose to occupy such premises within buildings of historical significance need to adapt to the existing fabric of the building, rather than seeking to alter it to suit modern, temporary retail preferences.

Approving this proposed removal sets an undesirable precedent. The City of Sydney has a duty to protect our beloved building from such an alteration. I strongly object to the proposed replacement of the coloured heritage glass.

This is a historically Victorian building and a beautifully piece of architecture. No changes should be made to the glass in this building which adds to its beauty.

Changing the well loved and beautiful stain glass on the QVB to plain glass makes no sense whatsoever. Shop displays are great - what more do we need to see?

Retailers are entirely in charge of where they lease to sell their wares. If the QVB as is does not suit them they can lease another space.

No changes to our beautiful QVB, please.

This would suck the life out of Sydney and give it to a corperate entity. The stained glass windows are an integral part of the QVB's charm.

The QVB is an iconic historical and cultural landmark, and the stained glass windows play a key role in the building's overall aesthetic. Replacing them with clear panes purely for the sake of more visibility into the upper level of retail displays drastically degrades the visual impact and character of the building as a valued piece of Sydney architecture. I would suggest that retailers put more effort into better utilising the ample display space they already have, or perhaps choose a different location to operate their business. The proposed change in this DA is nothing short of vandalism, and I'm sure it would draw much negative public sentiment towards council if approved. I would go as far as to suggest that management of the QVB be delegated to a different organisation, perhaps one that puts more care into respecting the history of the building, rather than solely chasing profits.

The stained glass windows are one of the most beautiful aspects of the QVB, and the idea that removing them would do anything other than decrease the beauty of the building is ridiculous.

The stained glass windows that this application seeks to remove are a fundamental part of the QVB aesthetic. Removing them is a step towards turning an iconic piece of Sydney architecture into a bland and generic mall for the sole profit of the landlord and at the expense of every Sydney resident and visitor.

The QVB is prime commercial real estate that is desired by luxury domestic and international brands. However, commercial rents have been steadily declining since 2020 - the inability to find tenants and the corresponding $1M lost revenue claimed in the application is surely a result of the landlord's refusal to accept market value rent rather than the commercial viability of stained glass windows.

The QVB is a Sydney icon and this proposal for significant changes to the facade is extremely short sighted. I urge you to reject it in it's entirety.

The comments from the community have spoken volumes. The fact that any council is bowing to tennants to change the original structure of an Australian building is laughable.

Despite that this building was built on the back of a colonial Australia that disrespected and discriminated the original owners of this nation (the First Nation people). This building has become a landmark of its own and is so much more than just a shop.

Do not approve this change. Send the tenants requesting this packing. I'm sure another tenant will willingly come and not request this horrible change.

This would not reflect well on the Sydney Council if this goes through.

Absolutely do not consider this request to make any changes to the existing coloured windows. This is part of what makes this QVB building so special and unique and so different to other steel / glass and concrete structures that are now being constructed. Hold on to what is left of Sydney’s heritage here so future generations can also enjoy it.
Commercial operators for ‘profit’ come and go. Let them go. This heritage building can continue on and on. Do not bow to them, do not make the slightest change as requested in this application. The simple and correct reply is NO. Your application is REJECTED.

We definitely don’t agree with these windows being removed. They need to respect our cities heritage. Online sales are more likely a bigger problem for these retailers. I hope the citizens of Sydney object to this ridiculous idea.

The coloured glass should be preserved on the QBV as it is integral to its heritage and historic value. So much of the city has changed for new and we have lost so much of our history. It needs to be preserved for generations to come and be a draw card for tourists and locals alike. It’s the heart of the city and needs to be protected. Sydneysiders have always used the Queen Victoria statue or town hall stairs as a meeting point. The Christmas tree is a tradition to go visit and the clock inside is a joy to watch in action on the hour.

The argument that Vicinity Centres has put forward, that the coloured glass blocks visibility to the interior is not logical, laughable and narrow minded. It circles the top section of the windows so why in any way does it block visibility? It is a huge part of the charm and character of the building. Something modern architecture lacks. Brands and landlords come and go but the QBV remains. Protect history.

The stained glass should stay its historic and creates a point of difference. Why becoming bland and cookie cutter when you have a genuine point of difference of the QVB being a historic building.

The QVB is not merely a commercial property; it is a living monument of Sydney’s heritage, a masterpiece of craftsmanship and cultural identity. These stained-glass windows are integral to its character and historical authenticity. To remove them would be nothing short of an act of cultural vandalism.

This proposal disregards the values that have preserved the QVB for generations. In the 1960s, the building was nearly demolished for a car park - a decision that would have erased a piece of our soul. It was saved because the community understood that heritage is priceless. That same principle applies today.

The argument for profit cannot and must not override the public good or our shared history. In fact, it is highly questionable that this change would increase profits. On the contrary, such a move risks alienating the very patrons who cherish the QVB for its authenticity. People outraged by this action will vote with their feet, and the reputational damage will far outweigh any perceived financial gain. I for one will be ensuring I will not patron the QVB if the coloured glass windows are replaced.

The QVB stands as a testament to vision, resilience, and artistry. To compromise its integrity for short-term interests is unacceptable. I urge you to reject this proposal in its entirety and uphold the values that make Sydney a city of character and pride.

I find the proposal to remove the coloured glass to not be in the spirit of the Heritage listing. While they claim that it should be allowed as the glass has already been replaced before and is an economical recreation of the original, to take this at face value would suggest that any repairs or remediation not made to exact specification could be removed in future. The attempt at recreating the stained glass design however shows a love and design for this building.

Given the economic impact to the landlord is the major concern, perhaps they could instead consider managing the property better and negotiating multiple leases for the space rather than letting downtime impact them so much.

I am completely against the removal of the stained glass windows. These window are integral to the history of the QVB.

If a shop cannot make a profit without changing these windows to clear glass they are in the wrong place and have a tenuous business model.

The QVB needs to be kept as it is.

The QVB is a stunning and very well-preserved example of Victorian architecture in Sydney. The coloured glass is an integral part of that. If a commercial entity does not feel that the coloured glass is in keeping with its brand or vision for its store, there are plenty of other, more modern commercial spaces in the QVB that do not have this feature — especially since the rise in working from home in recent years. I shop in the QVB regularly and strongly oppose this submission on heritage grounds as I feel it is contrary to the spirit of the QVB’s well-deserved heritage listing.

It is unbelievable yet inevitable that once again the implicit and important cultural values of Australian icons are being challenged as everything is monetised. QVB provides visitors with a unique experience and that is part of its multi-valued presence in the city. In world terms this is a young city so heritage of any kind is beautiful. Only need to read the comments of the glass artists in the Sydney Morning Herald to understand the significance of this glass and the petty importance of this application to replace it, especially in a time of evanescent ebbing in real-time shopping. Please consider how important this is in the rebuilding of confidence in continuity and hope after the pandemic. Thanks

This building has interest and character and they want to make it bland and boring. It is "demolition by degree and stealth". Presumably these tenants want to be in there because the QVB is good for them. If they don't like its essential charm and character, tell them to go somewhere else.

Cultural heritage is sometimes a tangible object, and at other times intangible feeling, and many times is a bit of both. The Queen Victoria Building's architecture, interior design, layout and glass facade are a big part of what makes the QVB an iconic building that evokes the grandeur and nolstagia of Sydney during the era of its namesake/patron. An important element of this design are its stained-glass and coloured-mosaic windows. "Modernising" the building windows by replacing these stained-glass windows with clear glass, will result in the heritage look (tangible object) and nostalgic "Victorian period character" (intangible feel) of the building being irrepairably altered for the worse. We will damage one of the key things that make this building unique amongst all the other buildings in Sydney, and the world.

Respect for "old buildings" should extend to preserving its look, character and feel. This includes its unique design elements like the windows.

I am very disappointed to hear about this proposal, and strongly urge the City of Sydney planning council to reject this proposal.

I strongly oppose changing out the stained glass on the QVB. This is one of Sydney's rare large-scale heritage gems. To strip it of its colour and character for the profit of some international conglomerate would be a shameful capitulation to corporate interests. It is the owner's job to find appropriate retail tenants - ones that respect the value of the site and recognise the privilege of operating there. The City of Sydney must heed the public's vociferous opposition and reject this application in its entirety.

The QVB is a heritage listed building, therefore every aspect of it needs to be protected, both inside and outside.

To prioritise a multi million dollar company’s aesthetic over the iconic history, and charm of this building that has been part of Sydney’s character for generations is laughable.

Sydney needs to stand up and make the right decision to show that the city’s history is not for sale.

As a long term resident of Sydney with a family tree in Sydney that goes back to the Victorian era when the QVB was built, and as someone who has visited the QVB countless times and supported its retailers, I strongly object to any removal of the stained glass windows in the QVB. They were meticulously restored in the 1908s to match the original Victorian window design. These windows are integral to the heritage design and must remain in place. To remove them for short-sighted commercial reasons, driven by the whims of a private retailer, is entirely unjustifiable. In the interests of the broader community and the preservation of Sydney’s essential heritage character, this development application must be rejected.